close icon
daily.dev platform

Discover more from daily.dev

Personalized news feed, dev communities and search, much better than whatโ€™s out there. Maybe ;)

Start reading - Free forever
Start reading - Free forever
Continue reading >

CAP Theorem Explained: Consistency, Availability, Partition Tolerance

CAP Theorem Explained: Consistency, Availability, Partition Tolerance
Author
Nimrod Kramer
Related tags on daily.dev
toc
Table of contents
arrow-down

๐ŸŽฏ

Understand the CAP theorem and its impact on distributed systems. Learn about Consistency, Availability, and Partition Tolerance trade-offs. Explore system types and design choices.

The CAP theorem is a fundamental concept in distributed computing that states you can only guarantee two out of three properties in a distributed system:

  • Consistency: All nodes see the same data at the same time
  • Availability: Every working node responds to requests
  • Partition Tolerance: The system keeps working even if network issues occur

Key points:

  • You must choose which two properties are most important for your system
  • This choice affects system design and behavior
  • PACELC extends CAP by considering latency during normal operations
System Type Consistency Availability Partition Tolerance Best For
CP Yes No Yes Apps needing strong consistency
AP No Yes Yes Apps requiring high uptime
CA Yes Yes No Apps with reliable networks

Understanding the CAP theorem helps make better choices when creating reliable and efficient distributed systems.

2. What is the CAP Theorem?

CAP Theorem

The CAP Theorem, also called Brewer's theorem, is a key idea in distributed computing. It says that a distributed system can only guarantee two out of three properties:

Property Description
Consistency All nodes see the same data at the same time
Availability Every working node responds to requests
Partition Tolerance The system keeps working even if network issues occur

Eric Brewer introduced this idea in 2000. It helps people understand the trade-offs when building distributed systems.

Here's what each property means:

  • Consistency: When data is updated, all later reads show the new data.
  • Availability: The system keeps working, even if some parts fail.
  • Partition Tolerance: The system works even when network issues happen.

The CAP theorem shows that you can't have all three at once. You must pick which two are most important for your system.

When designing a distributed system, you need to think about which properties matter most for your needs. This choice affects how your system works and how well it can handle different situations.

3. Understanding the Components

3.1 Consistency

Consistency means all parts of a system show the same data at the same time. There are two types:

Type Description
Strong consistency All parts always show the same data
Eventual consistency Parts may show different data briefly, but will match soon

Strong consistency often uses special methods to make sure all parts agree before changing data. Eventual consistency is used when the system needs to stay up and running, even if some parts don't match for a short time.

3.2 Availability

Availability means a system keeps working even if some parts fail. It's about making sure users can always use the system.

Systems with high availability:

  • Have backup parts
  • Spread work across many machines
  • Can quickly switch to working parts if some fail

This is important for things like online stores or banking, where the system needs to work all the time.

3.3 Partition Tolerance

Partition tolerance means a system can work even when some parts can't talk to each other. This happens when network problems cut off some machines.

Systems that are partition tolerant:

  • Can keep working with only some parts
  • Use special ways to agree on what to do, even when cut off
  • Are good for systems that work over unreliable networks

Partition tolerance helps systems stay up even when network problems happen.

4. The CAP Trade-off

The CAP theorem says that a distributed data storage system can't have all three of these at once:

  • Consistency
  • Availability
  • Partition tolerance

System designers must pick two out of these three based on what their system needs most.

4.1 Comparing System Types

Here's a simple breakdown of how different systems prioritize these properties:

System Type Consistency Availability Partition Tolerance
CP Yes No Yes
AP No Yes Yes
CA Yes Yes No

Let's look at each type:

CP Systems:

  • Keep data the same everywhere
  • Work when network issues happen
  • Might not always be available

AP Systems:

  • Always work
  • Handle network problems
  • Might show old or different data sometimes

CA Systems:

  • Keep data the same everywhere
  • Always work
  • Can't handle network problems well

When building a system, you need to think about which two properties matter most for what you're trying to do.

sbb-itb-bfaad5b

5. Types of Distributed Systems

Distributed systems come in three main types based on the CAP theorem: CP, AP, and CA. Each type focuses on two out of three key features: Consistency, Availability, and Partition Tolerance.

5.1 CP Systems

CP systems put Consistency and Partition Tolerance first. They make sure all parts of the system show the same data, even when network problems happen. But they might not always be available.

Feature Description
Focus Consistency, Partition Tolerance
Trade-off May not always be available
Examples Google's Chubby, Apache ZooKeeper
Best for Apps that need strong consistency

5.2 AP Systems

AP systems focus on Availability and Partition Tolerance. They stay up and running even when network issues occur, but data might not always match across all parts.

Feature Description
Focus Availability, Partition Tolerance
Trade-off Data might not always match
Examples Amazon's DynamoDB, Riak
Best for Apps that need to stay up all the time

5.3 CA Systems

CA systems aim for Consistency and Availability. They keep data the same everywhere and stay up and running, but they can't handle network problems well.

Feature Description
Focus Consistency, Availability
Trade-off Can't handle network problems
Examples MySQL, PostgreSQL
Best for Apps with strong networks that need matching data

When picking a system, think about which two features matter most for what you're trying to do.

6. How CAP Theorem Affects System Design

The CAP theorem shapes how we build systems. It makes us choose between keeping data the same everywhere, always being available, or working when network problems happen. We can't have all three at once.

When making a system, we need to think about what it needs most. For example:

  • If data must always match, we might pick a CP system.
  • If the system must always work, an AP system might be better.

To handle these trade-offs, we can use some tricks:

  • Copy data: Put the same data in many places. This helps the system stay up, but data might not always match.
  • Share the work: Spread tasks across many computers. This keeps things running, but data might be different in some places.
  • Fix conflicts: Use ways to make data match when network issues happen.

Knowing about CAP helps us make better choices when building systems.

System Type What It Does Good For
CP Keeps data the same, works with network issues Systems that need matching data
AP Always works, handles network problems Systems that must stay up all the time
CA Keeps data the same, always works Systems with good networks that need matching data

7. PACELC: An Extension of CAP

PACELC

PACELC builds on the CAP theorem by adding a new factor: latency. It helps us understand how distributed systems work in both normal and problem situations.

Here's what PACELC means:

Letter Stands For Meaning
P Partition When network problems happen
A Availability System keeps working
C Consistency All parts show the same data
E Else When everything is working normally
L Latency How fast the system responds
C Consistency All parts show the same data

PACELC says:

  • When network problems happen (P), you must choose between availability (A) and consistency (C).
  • When everything is working (E), you must choose between low latency (L) and consistency (C).

This idea helps system builders make better choices. It shows that even when things are working well, there's still a trade-off between speed and keeping data the same everywhere.

Why PACELC matters:

  • It gives a more complete picture than CAP
  • It helps explain how systems work in normal times, not just during problems
  • It shows that speed is important for users

When building a system, you need to think about:

  1. How to handle network problems
  2. How to balance speed and data matching in normal times

PACELC helps you make these choices based on what your system needs most.

System Needs Best Choice
Fast responses May need to let data be different in some places
Data always matching May need to be slower

8. Conclusion

The CAP theorem helps us understand how to build big computer systems that work with lots of data. It tells us we can't have everything we want at once. We have to choose what's most important:

  1. Making sure all parts of the system show the same data
  2. Keeping the system working all the time
  3. Handling problems when parts of the system can't talk to each other

When building a system, we need to pick which two of these are most important. This choice depends on what the system needs to do.

Here's a simple breakdown of the choices:

System Type What It Does Good For
CP Keeps data the same, works when parts are cut off Systems that need correct data all the time
AP Always works, handles network problems Systems that must stay up no matter what
CA Keeps data the same, always works Systems with good networks that need matching data

Understanding the CAP theorem helps people make better systems. It makes them think about what's really important for their needs.

FAQs

What is CAP theorem availability and partition tolerance?

The CAP theorem says a big computer system can only have two out of three things:

Feature Description
Consistency All parts show the same data
Availability System always works
Partition Tolerance System works when network problems happen

Availability means the system always works. Partition tolerance means it can handle network problems.

What are the three properties supported in the CAP theorem?

The CAP theorem talks about three main things:

Property Meaning
Consistency All parts show the same, up-to-date data
Availability System always responds to requests
Partition Tolerance System works even with network issues

What is the CAP theorem easily explained?

The CAP theorem is about big computer systems that work with lots of data. It says you can only pick two out of three things:

  1. Same data everywhere
  2. Always working
  3. Handling network problems

You need to choose what's most important for your system.

Is the CAP theorem proven?

Yes, the CAP theorem has been proven. Here's a quick timeline:

Year Event
1999 First shared as an idea
2000 Presented at a big computer meeting
2002 Formally proven by MIT researchers

What is the CAP theorem tradeoff?

The CAP theorem tradeoff is about choosing between consistency and availability when network problems happen. You can't have both at the same time. You need to decide which one is more important for your system before problems occur.

Related posts

Why not level up your reading with

Stay up-to-date with the latest developer news every time you open a new tab.

Read more