close icon
daily.dev platform

Discover more from daily.dev

Personalized news feed, dev communities and search, much better than what’s out there. Maybe ;)

Start reading - Free forever
Start reading - Free forever
Continue reading >

Kubernetes CNI Comparison: Flannel vs Calico vs Canal

Kubernetes CNI Comparison: Flannel vs Calico vs Canal
Author
Nimrod Kramer
Related tags on daily.dev
toc
Table of contents
arrow-down

🎯

Compare Kubernetes CNIs Flannel, Calico, and Canal. Learn about performance, security, and scalability for different cluster sizes. Choose the best CNI for your needs.

Choosing the right Container Network Interface (CNI) is crucial for Kubernetes cluster performance, security, and reliability. Here's a quick comparison of Flannel, Calico, and Canal:

Feature Flannel Calico Canal
Ease of use Easiest Complex Moderate
Performance Good Best Very good
Security Basic Advanced Advanced
Scalability Limited Excellent Very good
Best for Small to medium clusters Large, security-focused clusters Balance of performance and ease

Key takeaways:

  • Flannel: Simple setup, good for smaller clusters
  • Calico: Advanced features, best for large-scale deployments
  • Canal: Combines Flannel and Calico, offering a middle ground

Choose based on your cluster size, security needs, and technical expertise.

1. Flannel

Flannel

Network Performance

Flannel is a simple networking option for Kubernetes clusters. It uses UDP to send data, which can be slower and less reliable than other options. However, Flannel works well for many uses, especially when speed isn't the top priority.

Scalability

Flannel can handle large Kubernetes clusters. It uses a system where each part of the cluster has its own Flannel agent. These agents talk to a main Flannel server to manage the network. This setup allows Flannel to work with thousands of nodes in one cluster.

Deployment Complexity

Flannel is easy to set up. You can start it using a simple YAML file, and you don't need any extra tools. This makes it good for people who want to set up a Kubernetes cluster quickly without dealing with complex network settings.

Feature Description
Network Type UDP-based
Cluster Size Can handle thousands of nodes
Setup Simple YAML file, no extra tools needed

Flannel is a good choice if you want an easy-to-use network for your Kubernetes cluster. While it may not be the fastest option, it's simple to set up and can work with large clusters.

2. Calico

Calico

Network Performance

Calico uses IP-in-IP tunneling and BGP routing for Kubernetes networking. This setup gives Calico better speed and less delay than Flannel, especially in big clusters.

Scalability

Calico works well for large Kubernetes clusters. It uses a spread-out system where each node runs a Calico agent that talks to the main Calico control center. This lets Calico handle thousands of nodes in one cluster.

Security Features

Calico offers strong security options:

  • Network rules to control traffic between pods
  • Data encryption
  • User authentication

These features make Calico popular with big companies that need tight security.

Deployment Complexity

Setting up Calico is harder than Flannel. You need to know more about networking, like BGP routing. But Calico gives you tools and guides to help make setup easier.

Feature Calico Details
Network Type IP-in-IP tunneling with BGP routing
Cluster Size Can handle thousands of nodes
Security Network rules, encryption, user checks
Setup Harder than Flannel, needs network know-how

Calico is good if you want fast networking with strong security. It's harder to set up than Flannel, but it works well for big companies with large clusters.

sbb-itb-bfaad5b

3. Canal

Canal

Network Performance

Canal combines Calico and Flannel for Kubernetes networking. It uses:

  • Calico's networking model
  • Flannel's networking backend

This mix aims to balance good performance with ease of use. Canal manages network policies and isolation using Calico, while Flannel handles the basic networking.

Scalability

Canal can handle big Kubernetes clusters. It uses:

  • Calico's control plane for network policies and isolation
  • Flannel for basic networking

This setup allows Canal to work well in large setups.

Security Features

Canal offers strong security:

  • Network policies
  • Network isolation
  • Encryption
  • User checks

It uses Calico's model for policies and isolation, with Flannel managing the network underneath.

Deployment Complexity

Setting up Canal is easier than Calico but harder than Flannel alone. You'll need some networking knowledge, especially about Calico's model. Canal provides help tools and guides for setup.

Feature Canal Details
Network Type Calico model + Flannel backend
Cluster Size Works with large clusters
Security Policies, isolation, encryption, user checks
Setup Easier than Calico, needs some network know-how

Canal is good if you want a mix of good network performance and simpler setup. It has strong security and is easier to deploy than Calico on its own.

Strengths and Weaknesses

Overview of CNI Providers

Each CNI option has good and bad points. Knowing these helps you pick the right one for your Kubernetes cluster.

Flannel, Calico, and Canal: Pros and Cons

CNI Pros Cons
Flannel • Simple setup
• Works well for small/medium clusters
• Supports different network types
• Not for big clusters
• Basic network rules
• Less safe than others
Calico • Works for big clusters
• Strong network rules
• Good safety features
• Hard to set up
• Needs network know-how
• Not as simple as Flannel
Canal • Mix of Calico and Flannel good points
• Works well and for big clusters
• Strong network rules
• Hard to set up
• Needs to know both Calico and Flannel
• Not as simple as Flannel

How They Compare

Feature Flannel Calico Canal
Easy to Use Yes No No
Works for Big Clusters No Yes Yes
Network Rules Basic Strong Strong
Safety Basic Good Good
Speed Good Fast Fast

This table shows how Flannel, Calico, and Canal stack up against each other. It helps you see which one might work best for what you need.

Summary

When picking a Kubernetes CNI provider, think about what your cluster needs. Here's a quick look at Flannel, Calico, and Canal:

Picking the Right CNI

Use this table to help you choose the best CNI for your needs:

Cluster Size Network Rules Ease of Use Best CNI Choice
Small to medium Basic Very easy Flannel
Large Strong Harder Calico or Canal
Any size Strong Medium Canal

Main Points

CNI Best For Network Rules Setup
Flannel Small to medium clusters Basic Easy
Calico Large clusters Strong Hard
Canal Mix of easy use and good rules Strong Medium

Remember:

  • Flannel is easy to use but has basic features
  • Calico is harder to set up but works well for big clusters
  • Canal mixes Calico and Flannel, giving you both easy use and good network rules

Pick the CNI that fits your cluster size, network needs, and how much time you can spend setting it up.

FAQs

What is the alternative to Flannel in Kubernetes?

Kubernetes

Project Calico is a good option instead of Flannel for Kubernetes networking. While Flannel is simple, Calico offers more features and works well for bigger setups.

How do you choose a CNI?

When picking a CNI (Container Network Interface), think about:

Factor Description
Speed How fast the network runs
Safety What security features it has
Size How big a cluster it can handle
Ease of use How easy it is to set up and use
Fit How well it works with your Kubernetes setup

Look at these things to find the CNI that works best for your cluster.

What is the difference between weave and Flannel?

Weave Net and Flannel are both for Kubernetes networking, but they work differently:

Feature Flannel Weave Net
Type Simple, basic networking Mesh overlay network
Setup Easy to use Easy to install and set up
Best for Basic needs More complex networking needs

Flannel is good for simple setups, while Weave Net works well when you need more from your network.

Related posts

Why not level up your reading with

Stay up-to-date with the latest developer news every time you open a new tab.

Read more