A personal essay recounting the experience of judging a technical writing contest with four hundred entries, most of which read as suspiciously polished, formulaic AI-generated 'slop.' The author develops twenty-two informal rules for spotting authentic writing (grudges, risky numbers, admitted confusion, specific settings, non-triadic structure, etc.), tests them against an old human-written vendor whitepaper (which fails most rules too), and turns them on his own writing (which also fails some). Concludes that the real differentiator isn't style but 'cost' - what the sentence risked or cost the author to write - and that AI didn't invent slop, it just removed the price floor on producing it.

10m read timeFrom blog.sqlauthority.com
Post cover image
Table of contents
The Spreadsheet Began on Day TwoThe Rules, Which I Wrote Down at Night, in a Dressing GownDay Nine, and Some Loss of PerspectiveThen, Because I Am a Certain Kind of Person, I Ran It on MyselfThe Entry That WonWhat I Would Tell You, Having Been Through It
27.2K Impressions2 Comments