--- title: Cursor built its own GitHub. Why? | daily.dev description: Cursor launched Origin, a new code hosting platform that syncs GitHub repositories and adds an 'agentic code review' feature designed to flag only diffs that... canonical: https://daily.dev/posts/cursor-built-its-own-github-why--k1047hygc twitter:card: summary_large_image twitter:site: @dailydotdev og:type: website og:site_name: daily.dev og:title: Cursor built its own GitHub. Why? | daily.dev og:description: Cursor launched Origin, a new code hosting platform that syncs GitHub repositories and adds an 'agentic code review' feature designed to flag only diffs that... og:url: https://daily.dev/posts/cursor-built-its-own-github-why--k1047hygc og:image: https://api.daily.dev/og/posts/K1047HYgC.png og:image:alt: Cursor built its own GitHub. Why? og:image:width: 1200 og:image:height: 630 og:locale: en --- > ## Documentation Index > Fetch the complete documentation index at: https://daily.dev/llms.txt > Use this file to discover all available pages before exploring further. # Cursor built its own GitHub. Why? **[Trends](https://daily.dev/sources/trends)** · 2 min read · 30 upvotes · 7 comments ## Summary Cursor launched Origin, a new code hosting platform that syncs GitHub repositories and adds an 'agentic code review' feature designed to flag only diffs that need human attention. The product ships with two tabs: Codebase for creating or syncing repos, and Review for AI-driven review workflows. The rollout followed a closed beta, waitlist, and staged release under a /codebase path before the full launch. The underlying bet is that as AI agents generate more code, someone needs to review it at scale, and Cursor wants to own that layer rather than cede it to GitHub. Early reaction is mostly curious rather than critical, with open questions about vendor lock-in and how this reshapes the traditional pull-request review model. ## Content Cursor picked a hell of a day to launch a GitHub competitor. Origin, its new git hosting platform built by the Graphite team, went live in beta the same day GitHub suffered an 8+ hour worldwide outage hitting Actions, API, Pull Requests, and Webhooks. Microsoft's stock reportedly dropped over 3% on the news, wiping out $100B in market value. The internet noticed the timing immediately. The pitch: Origin is git hosting rebuilt for AI agents instead of humans. Where GitHub assumes sequential commits and human-paced reviews, Origin claims to handle extreme concurrency, agent-driven PRs, stacked diffs, automated merge-conflict resolution, and MCP support so agents can operate on repos programmatically. Demo numbers floated include ~22.6 commits/sec on a single repo and sub-400ms global sync. It syncs bidirectionally with GitHub, runs existing CI unchanged, and ships on by default for all paid Cursor plans, opt-out only for enterprise. Not everyone's buying the "perfect timing" narrative. Mitsuhiko's take: "given how often GitHub is down these days I don't find the timing to be too impressive." Fair, GitHub has had a rough month, including a separate 9-hour Actions degradation on August 6 with 71% workflow failure rates. Origin's own engineer, Tomas Reimers, was refreshingly blunt on Hacker News, admitting that beyond uptime there's "very little" differentiating Origin right now, with deeper agent features promised later. The bigger story people are chewing on isn't the outage coincidence, it's the vertical stack. Cursor's parent Anysphere was acquired by SpaceX for $60B, meaning one company now potentially controls the editor, the agents, the model, and now the code host. That's raising real questions since Origin's data terms (retention, training use, residency, subprocessors) aren't published anywhere. There's also an unpatched Cursor vulnerability involving arbitrary code execution via a malicious git.exe, still without a CVE, sitting in the background of all this. Reactions split along predictable lines. Jared Palmer: "Competition is healthy... Congrats to the Cursor team." Others are framing it as Cursor moving down the stack, IDE, agents, repos, PRs, CI, deploy, all one company, one loop. One poster's joke lands cleanly: "GitHub built the home for human developers. Cursor is building the home for AI developers." Whether that's inspiring or unsettling depends entirely on how you feel about agents writing most of your codebase already, and who you trust to host it. ## Questions this post answers ### What is Cursor's Origin and how is it different from GitHub? Origin is a git hosting platform built by the Graphite team and launched by Cursor, designed for AI agents rather than humans. It supports extreme concurrency, agent-driven pull requests, stacked diffs, automated merge-conflict resolution, and MCP support so agents can operate on repos programmatically, with demoed numbers of about 22.6 commits per second on a single repo and sub-400ms global sync. It syncs bidirectionally with GitHub and runs existing CI unchanged. _daily.dev helps developers weighing new AI-native infrastructure like Origin against established tools track the tradeoffs._ ### Why did GitHub go down and how long did the outage last? GitHub suffered a worldwide outage lasting more than 8 hours, affecting Actions, API, Pull Requests, and Webhooks. Microsoft's stock reportedly dropped over 3% following the news, wiping out roughly $100B in market value. This followed a separate 9-hour Actions degradation on August 6 that saw a 71% workflow failure rate. _Teams depending on GitHub uptime for CI and deploys can follow incident patterns like this one on daily.dev._ ### Who owns Cursor and what is the vertical integration concern with Origin? Cursor's parent company, Anysphere, was acquired by SpaceX for $60B. Combined with the Origin launch, this means one company could potentially control the code editor, the AI agents, the underlying model, and now the code hosting platform itself. This raises concerns because Origin's data terms covering retention, training use, residency, and subprocessors have not been published. _Engineers deciding how much of their stack to trust to one vendor can weigh consolidation risks like Cursor's on daily.dev._ ## Community take How the wider developer community reacted, aggregated from 1 discussion across x (as of 2026-09-13). **TL;DR:** There's essentially no usable discussion content provided for this launch, so no meaningful community sentiment can be determined. **Sentiment:** 10% positive · 20% mixed · 70% skeptical **By community** - x (mixed): No substantive replies were provided, so no clear consensus can be drawn. **Source threads** - [x](https://x.com/lafigueiredo/status/2090077295876743370) · 0 points · 0 comments ## Community discussion Top comments from developers on daily.dev. **@oscarpearson** · 6 upvotes > Any version control platform that also sells AI as a product is 100% sure to use your code to train it's AI. Although that might be every single platform nowadays. **@kramer** · 4 upvotes > Elon is dead serious about winning developers... **@petecapecod** · 3 upvotes > I thought they were going to come out last time GH went down (action-gate 26) but they went with this outage. Ok well you need to have Cursor Paid to even use it 👌🏼 so not a full GH replacement already. > > My money's on EntireHQ, no paid account AND it's way faster than Origin. > > Also they don't just train on your private code bros ## Similar posts on daily.dev - [Why Cursor Origin Still Needs GitHub to Boot](https://daily.dev/posts/why-cursor-origin-still-needs-github-to-boot-ncesneoey) · Medium · 0 upvotes · 0 comments --- Tags: [#devtools](https://daily.dev/tags/devtools), [#github](https://daily.dev/tags/github), [#ai-agents](https://daily.dev/tags/ai-agents), [#code-review](https://daily.dev/tags/code-review) [View this post on daily.dev](https://daily.dev/posts/cursor-built-its-own-github-why--k1047hygc) ```json {"@context":"https://schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https://daily.dev/#organization","name":"daily.dev","url":"https://daily.dev","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","url":"https://daily.dev/apple-touch-icon.png","width":180,"height":180},"sameAs":["https://twitter.com/dailydotdev","https://github.com/dailydotdev","https://www.linkedin.com/company/daily-dev-ltd"]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https://daily.dev/#website","url":"https://daily.dev","name":"daily.dev","publisher":{"@id":"https://daily.dev/#organization"},"potentialAction":{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https://daily.dev/search?q={search_term_string}"},"query-input":"required name=search_term_string"}}]} {"@context":"https://schema.org","@type":"TechArticle","headline":"Cursor built its own GitHub. Why?","url":"https://daily.dev/posts/cursor-built-its-own-github-why--k1047hygc","mainEntityOfPage":{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https://daily.dev/posts/cursor-built-its-own-github-why--k1047hygc"},"datePublished":"2026-08-17T17:09:09.836Z","dateModified":"2026-09-13T20:02:09.892Z","description":"Cursor launched Origin, a new code hosting platform that syncs GitHub repositories and adds an 'agentic code review' feature designed to flag only diffs that...","isAccessibleForFree":true,"articleSection":"Trends","inLanguage":"en","publisher":{"@type":"Organization","name":"daily.dev","url":"https://daily.dev","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","url":"https://daily.dev/apple-touch-icon.png","width":180,"height":180}},"author":{"@type":"Organization","name":"Trends","logo":"https://media.daily.dev/image/upload/s--ZfSp3asX--/f_auto,q_auto/v1780996004/logos/trends?_a=BAMAMiWQ0","url":"https://daily.dev/sources/trends"},"commentCount":7,"discussionUrl":"https://daily.dev/posts/cursor-built-its-own-github-why--k1047hygc","interactionStatistic":[{"@type":"InteractionCounter","interactionType":{"@type":"LikeAction"},"userInteractionCount":30},{"@type":"InteractionCounter","interactionType":{"@type":"CommentAction"},"userInteractionCount":7}],"keywords":"devtools,github,ai-agents,code-review","timeRequired":"PT2M"} {"@context":"https://schema.org","@type":"BreadcrumbList","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https://daily.dev"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Trends","item":"https://daily.dev/sources/trends"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":3,"name":"Cursor built its own GitHub. Why?"}]} {"@context":"https://schema.org","@type":"WebPage","@id":"https://daily.dev/posts/cursor-built-its-own-github-why--k1047hygc","comment":[{"@type":"Comment","text":"Any version control platform that also sells AI as a product is 100% sure to use your code to train it’s AI. Although that might be every single platform nowadays.","datePublished":"2026-08-18T10:18:15.254Z","url":"https://daily.dev/posts/K1047HYgC#c-AhToV3qio","author":{"@type":"Person","name":"Oscar Pearson","url":"https://daily.dev/oscarpearson","image":"https://media.daily.dev/image/upload/s--QnXAEQGE--/f_auto/v1780119425/avatars/avatar_bPCgf4qQE?_a=BAMAMiWQ0"},"interactionStatistic":{"@type":"InteractionCounter","interactionType":{"@type":"LikeAction"},"userInteractionCount":6}},{"@type":"Comment","text":"Elon is dead serious about winning developers…","datePublished":"2026-08-18T09:18:08.089Z","url":"https://daily.dev/posts/K1047HYgC#c-xoHAoNh3g","author":{"@type":"Person","name":"Nimrod Kramer","url":"https://daily.dev/kramer","image":"https://media.daily.dev/image/upload/v1682322243/avatars/avatar_1d339aa5b85c4e0ba85fdedb523c48d4.jpg"},"interactionStatistic":{"@type":"InteractionCounter","interactionType":{"@type":"LikeAction"},"userInteractionCount":4}},{"@type":"Comment","text":"I thought they were going to come out last time GH went down (action-gate 26) but they went with this outage. Ok well you need to have Cursor Paid to even use it 👌🏼 so not a full GH replacement already.\nMy money’s on EntireHQ, no paid account AND it’s way faster than Origin.\nAlso they don’t just train on your private code bros","datePublished":"2026-08-18T12:16:21.122Z","url":"https://daily.dev/posts/K1047HYgC#c-oAfbSy1yV","author":{"@type":"Person","name":"Peter Cruckshank","url":"https://daily.dev/petecapecod","image":"https://media.daily.dev/image/upload/s--ZJhQyKws--/f_auto/v1721235024/avatars/avatar_A9xh33q0QoxtkGoJRCosp"},"interactionStatistic":{"@type":"InteractionCounter","interactionType":{"@type":"LikeAction"},"userInteractionCount":3}}]} {"@context":"https://schema.org","@type":"FAQPage","@id":"https://daily.dev/posts/cursor-built-its-own-github-why--k1047hygc#faq","mainEntity":[{"@type":"Question","name":"What is Cursor's Origin and how is it different from GitHub?","acceptedAnswer":{"@type":"Answer","text":"Origin is a git hosting platform built by the Graphite team and launched by Cursor, designed for AI agents rather than humans. It supports extreme concurrency, agent-driven pull requests, stacked diffs, automated merge-conflict resolution, and MCP support so agents can operate on repos programmatically, with demoed numbers of about 22.6 commits per second on a single repo and sub-400ms global sync. It syncs bidirectionally with GitHub and runs existing CI unchanged. daily.dev helps developers weighing new AI-native infrastructure like Origin against established tools track the tradeoffs."}},{"@type":"Question","name":"Why did GitHub go down and how long did the outage last?","acceptedAnswer":{"@type":"Answer","text":"GitHub suffered a worldwide outage lasting more than 8 hours, affecting Actions, API, Pull Requests, and Webhooks. Microsoft's stock reportedly dropped over 3% following the news, wiping out roughly $100B in market value. This followed a separate 9-hour Actions degradation on August 6 that saw a 71% workflow failure rate. Teams depending on GitHub uptime for CI and deploys can follow incident patterns like this one on daily.dev."}},{"@type":"Question","name":"Who owns Cursor and what is the vertical integration concern with Origin?","acceptedAnswer":{"@type":"Answer","text":"Cursor's parent company, Anysphere, was acquired by SpaceX for $60B. Combined with the Origin launch, this means one company could potentially control the code editor, the AI agents, the underlying model, and now the code hosting platform itself. This raises concerns because Origin's data terms covering retention, training use, residency, and subprocessors have not been published. Engineers deciding how much of their stack to trust to one vendor can weigh consolidation risks like Cursor's on daily.dev."}}]} ```