<!-- mobian-agent-page publisher="dailydev" canonical="https://daily.dev/posts/ed-zitron-reads-my-mind-zydthmqor" -->

---
title: Ed Zitron Reads My Mind | daily.dev
description: Modern software feels broken because companies cut testers and documentation writers while chasing growth, the author argues, echoing Ed Zitron's writing. AI...
canonical: https://daily.dev/posts/ed-zitron-reads-my-mind-zydthmqor
twitter:card: summary_large_image
twitter:site: @dailydotdev
og:type: website
og:site_name: daily.dev
og:title: Ed Zitron Reads My Mind | daily.dev
og:description: Modern software feels broken because companies cut testers and documentation writers while chasing growth, the author argues, echoing Ed Zitron's writing. AI...
og:url: https://daily.dev/posts/ed-zitron-reads-my-mind-zydthmqor
og:image: https://api.daily.dev/og/posts/zyDTHmqor.png
og:image:alt: Ed Zitron Reads My Mind
og:image:width: 1200
og:image:height: 630
og:locale: en
---

> ## Documentation Index
> Fetch the complete documentation index at: https://daily.dev/llms.txt
> Use this file to discover all available pages before exploring further.

# Ed Zitron Reads My Mind

**[DevelopSense](https://daily.dev/sources/developsense)** · 3 min read · 1 upvotes · 0 comments

## Summary

Modern software feels broken because companies cut testers and documentation writers while chasing growth, the author argues, echoing Ed Zitron's writing. AI tools get praised partly because they fill the gap left by missing troubleshooting documentation, even though their advice often contains errors. The piece ties software failures to a lack of critical thinking in development, defining testing as the practical form of that critical thinking. It closes with a direct call: take testing seriously.

## Full article

daily.dev links to this article rather than hosting it. Read it at the original source: <https://developsense.com/blog/2026/10/ed-zitron-reads-my-mind>

## Questions this post answers

### why does AI-generated troubleshooting advice sometimes contain errors but still feel useful

AI troubleshooting advice often contains errors, but it fills a void left by companies that eliminated their documentation writers before cutting their testers. When a feature is broken, missing, or inconsistent and no official documentation explains why, flawed AI-generated advice can still be better than having no guidance at all.

_Anyone leaning on AI to patch gaps in missing documentation can track these quality debates on daily.dev._

### what is the argument that testing represents critical thinking in software development

Testing is described as the enactment of critical thinking about software: asking whether a team could be mistaken in believing it has built something people will love. Producing valuable, 'better or smarter' software requires examining whether that goal was actually achieved, rather than assuming success after shipping.

_Engineers debating how much testing rigor a team truly needs can follow this reasoning on daily.dev._

## Similar posts on daily.dev

- [Tester 2.0: becoming indispensable in the age of AI](https://daily.dev/posts/tester-2-0-becoming-indispensable-in-the-age-of-ai-liomahwgt) · Filip Hric · 0 upvotes · 0 comments
- [I miss thinking hard.](https://daily.dev/posts/i-miss-thinking-hard--yy5t8f2rv) · Hacker News · 0 upvotes · 0 comments
- [Using My Fucking Brain](https://daily.dev/posts/using-my-fucking-brain-mmhyilgpb) · Terrible Software · 222 upvotes · 29 comments

---

Tags: [#ai](https://daily.dev/tags/ai), [#testing](https://daily.dev/tags/testing)

[View this post on daily.dev](https://daily.dev/posts/ed-zitron-reads-my-mind-zydthmqor)

```json
{"@context":"https://schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https://daily.dev/#organization","name":"daily.dev","url":"https://daily.dev","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","url":"https://daily.dev/apple-touch-icon.png","width":180,"height":180},"sameAs":["https://twitter.com/dailydotdev","https://github.com/dailydotdev","https://www.linkedin.com/company/daily-dev-ltd"]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https://daily.dev/#website","url":"https://daily.dev","name":"daily.dev","publisher":{"@id":"https://daily.dev/#organization"},"potentialAction":{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https://daily.dev/search?q={search_term_string}"},"query-input":"required name=search_term_string"}}]}
{"@context":"https://schema.org","@type":"TechArticle","headline":"Ed Zitron Reads My Mind","url":"https://daily.dev/posts/ed-zitron-reads-my-mind-zydthmqor","mainEntityOfPage":{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https://daily.dev/posts/ed-zitron-reads-my-mind-zydthmqor"},"datePublished":"2026-10-27T18:12:03.359Z","dateModified":"2026-10-27T18:23:39.781Z","description":"Modern software feels broken because companies cut testers and documentation writers while chasing growth, the author argues, echoing Ed Zitron's writing. AI...","image":"https://media.daily.dev/image/upload/f_auto,q_auto/v1/posts/3fd7677beb554573075a9aea6b5e7fb6?_a=AQAEuop","thumbnailUrl":"https://media.daily.dev/image/upload/f_auto,q_auto/v1/posts/3fd7677beb554573075a9aea6b5e7fb6?_a=AQAEuop","isAccessibleForFree":true,"articleSection":"DevelopSense","inLanguage":"en","publisher":{"@type":"Organization","name":"daily.dev","url":"https://daily.dev","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","url":"https://daily.dev/apple-touch-icon.png","width":180,"height":180}},"author":{"@type":"Organization","name":"DevelopSense","logo":"https://media.daily.dev/image/upload/t_logo,f_auto/v1/logos/bcb77f14dcc24c819b3552095fea6260","url":"https://daily.dev/sources/developsense"},"commentCount":0,"discussionUrl":"https://daily.dev/posts/ed-zitron-reads-my-mind-zydthmqor","interactionStatistic":[{"@type":"InteractionCounter","interactionType":{"@type":"LikeAction"},"userInteractionCount":1},{"@type":"InteractionCounter","interactionType":{"@type":"CommentAction"},"userInteractionCount":0}],"keywords":"ai,testing","timeRequired":"PT3M"}
{"@context":"https://schema.org","@type":"BreadcrumbList","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https://daily.dev"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"DevelopSense","item":"https://daily.dev/sources/developsense"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":3,"name":"Ed Zitron Reads My Mind"}]}
{"@context":"https://schema.org","@type":"FAQPage","@id":"https://daily.dev/posts/ed-zitron-reads-my-mind-zydthmqor#faq","mainEntity":[{"@type":"Question","name":"why does AI-generated troubleshooting advice sometimes contain errors but still feel useful","acceptedAnswer":{"@type":"Answer","text":"AI troubleshooting advice often contains errors, but it fills a void left by companies that eliminated their documentation writers before cutting their testers. When a feature is broken, missing, or inconsistent and no official documentation explains why, flawed AI-generated advice can still be better than having no guidance at all. Anyone leaning on AI to patch gaps in missing documentation can track these quality debates on daily.dev."}},{"@type":"Question","name":"what is the argument that testing represents critical thinking in software development","acceptedAnswer":{"@type":"Answer","text":"Testing is described as the enactment of critical thinking about software: asking whether a team could be mistaken in believing it has built something people will love. Producing valuable, 'better or smarter' software requires examining whether that goal was actually achieved, rather than assuming success after shipping. Engineers debating how much testing rigor a team truly needs can follow this reasoning on daily.dev."}}]}
```

