Everything You Need to Know About Ethereum Before Writing Smart Contracts
This title could be clearer and more informative.Try out Clickbait Shieldfor free (5 uses left this month).
A comprehensive primer on Ethereum aimed at developers preparing to write smart contracts. Covers the differences between Bitcoin and Ethereum (UTXO vs account model, Bitcoin Script vs EVM, Proof of Work vs Proof of Stake), core network mechanics (nodes, clients, accounts, gas, EIP-1559, wallets, RPCs), how the EVM executes transactions step by step, common smart contract patterns (ERC-20 tokens, escrow, AMMs), broader use cases (stablecoins, DAOs, ENS), the DAO hack and hard fork history, and the blockchain trilemma with Layer 2 rollup scaling solutions.
Table of contents
3. Smart Contracts: Autonomous Code on the BlockchainGet Vyom Pant ’s stories in your inbox2. Escrow Contracts (Conditional Custody)3. Automated Market Makers (AMM Liquidity Pools)Questions this post answers
How does Ethereum's account model differ from Bitcoin's UTXO model?
Bitcoin uses the UTXO model, functioning like physical cash where spending a bill returns change as a new output, while Ethereum uses an account-based model, acting like a global ledger of accounts with dynamic balances and stored memory states. This account model, combined with the Turing-complete Ethereum Virtual Machine, enables arbitrary programmable logic that Bitcoin Script cannot support. Developers comparing blockchain architectures can track deeper Ethereum and Bitcoin design explainers on daily.dev.
What caused the DAO hack in 2016 and how much ETH was stolen?
A reentrancy bug in The DAO's withdrawal logic let an attacker recursively call the withdraw function before the contract updated its internal balance, draining 3.6 million ETH. The incident split the community into 'Code is Law' purists and pragmatists, resulting in a hard fork that created Ethereum (ETH) with recovered funds and Ethereum Classic (ETC) preserving the original chain. Anyone auditing smart contracts for reentrancy risks can follow security writeups on daily.dev.
How do Optimistic Rollups differ from Zero-Knowledge Rollups for Ethereum scaling?
Optimistic Rollups, used by Arbitrum, Optimism, and Base, assume transactions are valid by default and allow a 7-day fraud-proof challenge window for disputing invalid state changes. Zero-Knowledge Rollups, like zkSync and Starknet, instead submit a succinct cryptographic proof (ZK-SNARK/STARK) to Layer 1 that mathematically guarantees validity instantly, avoiding long withdrawal delays. Developers choosing a Layer 2 for their dapp can compare rollup trade-offs through resources on daily.dev.