Five years after the SPACE framework was published, all six of its authors gathered in person for the first time at UC Irvine's Developer Experience Research Forum. Key reflections include: Activity metrics are newly controversial in the AI era as a single developer with AI agents can generate massive PR volumes that mean little in isolation; Communication and Collaboration is the most underinvested SPACE dimension and the only one where developers don't report AI-driven improvement; and the politics of productivity measurement are real, with data protection practices being essential. If updating SPACE today, the authors would add focus on Trust, Cognitive/Intent Debt, Deskilling, and AI Addiction. The core five dimensions have held up well, but the rubric should be rebalanced toward wellbeing and away from activity metrics.

11m read timeFrom newsletter.getdx.com
Post cover image
Table of contents
How SPACE came to beActivity metrics: newly controversial, newly importantThe politics of productivity measurementThe C in SPACE: the most underinvested dimensionWhat would you add to SPACE today?Final thoughts
8.1K Impressions