Software Freedom Conservancy's Bradley Kühn refutes GitHub and other LLM/gen-AI companies' claims that California's AI Transparency Act (Cal. Bus. & Prof. Code §22757 and proposed SB 1000 amendments) conflicts with FOSS licensing principles. The core argument: no currently deployed LLM-gen-AI system is actually FOSS, so the claimed conflict is moot. Even hypothetically, permissive licenses like MIT allow additional terms, and the GPL already has built-in termination clauses (GPLv3§12/GPLv2§7) that handle exactly these situations. SB 1000's change from 'revoke' to 'terminate' actually makes the law more GPL-compatible, not less. The post urges readers to contact California legislators in support of the law.

8m read timeFrom sfconservancy.org
Post cover image
Table of contents
Another Reason to Give Up GitHub !
1.8K Impressions