---
title: "How Effective Is Your SAT Program?"
url: https://daily.dev/posts/how-effective-is-your-sat-program--8tyqalctk
source_url: https://www.huntress.com/blog/the-wall-street-journal-says-sat-programs-do-more-harm-than-good-are-they-right
type: article
source: "Huntress Blog"
published: 2026-05-31T07:43:02.174Z
updated: 2026-05-31T08:16:42.390Z
tags: ["cyber", "phishing"]
reading_time: 9
upvotes: 0
comments: 0
language: en
---

> ## Documentation Index
> Fetch the complete documentation index at: https://daily.dev/llms.txt
> Use this file to discover all available pages before exploring further.

# How Effective Is Your SAT Program?

**[Huntress Blog](https://daily.dev/sources/huntress-blog)** · 9 min read · 0 upvotes · 0 comments

## Summary

A response to a Wall Street Journal critique of security awareness training (SAT) programs, arguing that the problem lies with poorly implemented programs rather than SAT itself. The post breaks down common failures — annual-only training, punitive phishing tests, irrelevant content — and outlines what effective SAT looks like: frequent short modules, real-world phishing simulations, story-based learning, personalized follow-up coaching, and a positive security culture. It concludes with a pitch for Huntress Managed SAT as a modern implementation of these principles.

## Full article

daily.dev links to this article rather than hosting it. Read it at the original source: <https://www.huntress.com/blog/the-wall-street-journal-says-sat-programs-do-more-harm-than-good-are-they-right>

---

Tags: [#cyber](https://daily.dev/tags/cyber), [#phishing](https://daily.dev/tags/phishing)

[View this post on daily.dev](https://daily.dev/posts/how-effective-is-your-sat-program--8tyqalctk)
