I tried Arcane for Docker management, and here's why Dockhand remains my pick

A hands-on comparison of Arcane and Dockhand as Docker management UIs, evaluated against Portainer. Arcane offers a polished interface, bulk container operations, and low resource usage (~50MB), but lacks inline per-container action buttons, selective container updates, scheduling/automation, and file browsing. Dockhand wins on control granularity: inline action buttons, selective updates, scheduled tasks, and optional vulnerability scanning via Trivy integration. Arcane is recommended for Portainer migrants seeking a cleaner UI, but Dockhand remains the preferred choice for users needing finer operational control.