<!-- mobian-agent-page publisher="dailydev" canonical="https://daily.dev/posts/kimi-k3-vs-gpt-5-6-sol-on-deepswe-cost-coding-and-routing-hnrwmvzdv" -->

---
title: Kimi K3 vs GPT-5.6 Sol on DeepSWE: Cost, Coding, and Routing
description: A head-to-head evaluation of Kimi K3 and GPT-5.6 Sol on the DeepSWE software engineering benchmark across 904 rollouts. GPT-5.6 Sol leads on pass@1 (72.7% vs...
canonical: https://daily.dev/posts/kimi-k3-vs-gpt-5-6-sol-on-deepswe-cost-coding-and-routing-hnrwmvzdv
twitter:card: summary_large_image
twitter:site: @dailydotdev
og:type: website
og:site_name: daily.dev
og:title: Kimi K3 vs GPT-5.6 Sol on DeepSWE: Cost, Coding, and Routing | daily.dev
og:description: A head-to-head evaluation of Kimi K3 and GPT-5.6 Sol on the DeepSWE software engineering benchmark across 904 rollouts. GPT-5.6 Sol leads on pass@1 (72.7% vs...
og:url: https://daily.dev/posts/kimi-k3-vs-gpt-5-6-sol-on-deepswe-cost-coding-and-routing-hnrwmvzdv
og:image: https://api.daily.dev/og/posts/hNrWmVZdv.png
og:image:alt: Kimi K3 vs GPT-5.6 Sol on DeepSWE: Cost, Coding, and Routing
og:image:width: 1200
og:image:height: 630
og:locale: en
---

> ## Documentation Index
> Fetch the complete documentation index at: https://daily.dev/llms.txt
> Use this file to discover all available pages before exploring further.

# Kimi K3 vs GPT-5.6 Sol on DeepSWE: Cost, Coding, and Routing

**[Together AI](https://daily.dev/sources/togetherai)** · 6 min read · 1 upvotes · 0 comments

## Summary

A head-to-head evaluation of Kimi K3 and GPT-5.6 Sol on the DeepSWE software engineering benchmark across 904 rollouts. GPT-5.6 Sol leads on pass@1 (72.7% vs 68.5%) and reliability, but Kimi K3 wins pass@4 (89.4% vs 85.8%) at 2.8x more solved tasks per dollar. The models fail in distinct ways — Sol breaks existing tests more often, Kimi K3 produces near-misses — and have only 0.46 correlation on which tasks they solve. A Kimi-first cascade that escalates to Sol when tests fail reaches ~85.6%, beating either model alone. Together they cover 108 of 113 tasks (95.6%). The post also promotes running Kimi K3 on Together AI's inference platform.

## Full article

daily.dev links to this article rather than hosting it. Read it at the original source: <https://www.together.ai/blog/kimi-k3-vs-gpt-5-6-sol-on-deepswe-cost-coding-and-routing>

## Questions this post answers

### How does Kimi K3 compare to GPT-5.6 Sol on the DeepSWE coding benchmark?

GPT-5.6 Sol wins single-attempt quality with a pass@1 of 72.7% versus Kimi K3's 68.5%, and it solves more tasks reliably on all four tries (61 vs 45). Kimi K3 overtakes Sol as attempts increase, reaching 89.4% pass@4 versus Sol's 85.8%, while costing 64% less per completed task and delivering 2.8x more solves per dollar spent.

_daily.dev surfaces benchmark comparisons like this for teams weighing model cost against coding reliability._

### Does routing between Kimi K3 and GPT-5.6 Sol improve coding accuracy over using either model alone?

Yes, running Kimi K3 first and escalating to GPT-5.6 Sol whenever a test suite rejects the result reaches about 85.6% accuracy, beating both individual models and even a perfect one-shot router at 83.4%. The two models diverge with only 0.46 correlation on which tasks they solve, together covering 108 of 113 DeepSWE tasks, with Kimi clearing roughly 70% of the queue before Sol is invoked.

_engineers building verifier-based agent cascades can track routing strategies like this through daily.dev._

### What are the typical failure modes of Kimi K3 versus GPT-5.6 Sol on coding tasks?

GPT-5.6 Sol breaks the repository's existing baseline tests in 20% of its failures, a pattern consistent with other GPT models. Kimi K3 fails its baseline tests only 11% of the time but has near misses in 65% of failures, where over 80% of new tests pass but a few still fail, meaning it gets close without fully succeeding.

_daily.dev helps developers stay on top of model failure patterns before picking a coding agent backend._

## Similar posts on daily.dev

- [GLM-5.3 vs. GPT-5.6 Sol on DeepSWE: Cost, Coding, and Routing](https://daily.dev/posts/glm-5-3-vs-gpt-5-6-sol-on-deepswe-cost-coding-and-routing-klsdguyhy) · Together AI · 3 upvotes · 0 comments

---

Tags: [#ai](https://daily.dev/tags/ai), [#ai-coding](https://daily.dev/tags/ai-coding), [#ai-gateway](https://daily.dev/tags/ai-gateway), [#kimi](https://daily.dev/tags/kimi)

[View this post on daily.dev](https://daily.dev/posts/kimi-k3-vs-gpt-5-6-sol-on-deepswe-cost-coding-and-routing-hnrwmvzdv)

```json
{"@context":"https://schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https://daily.dev/#organization","name":"daily.dev","url":"https://daily.dev","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","url":"https://daily.dev/apple-touch-icon.png","width":180,"height":180},"sameAs":["https://twitter.com/dailydotdev","https://github.com/dailydotdev","https://www.linkedin.com/company/daily-dev-ltd"]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https://daily.dev/#website","url":"https://daily.dev","name":"daily.dev","publisher":{"@id":"https://daily.dev/#organization"},"potentialAction":{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https://daily.dev/search?q={search_term_string}"},"query-input":"required name=search_term_string"}}]}
{"@context":"https://schema.org","@type":"TechArticle","headline":"Kimi K3 vs GPT-5.6 Sol on DeepSWE: Cost, Coding, and Routing","url":"https://daily.dev/posts/kimi-k3-vs-gpt-5-6-sol-on-deepswe-cost-coding-and-routing-hnrwmvzdv","mainEntityOfPage":{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https://daily.dev/posts/kimi-k3-vs-gpt-5-6-sol-on-deepswe-cost-coding-and-routing-hnrwmvzdv"},"datePublished":"2026-07-27T05:03:33.408Z","dateModified":"2026-10-15T02:22:10.372Z","description":"A head-to-head evaluation of Kimi K3 and GPT-5.6 Sol on the DeepSWE software engineering benchmark across 904 rollouts. GPT-5.6 Sol leads on pass@1 (72.7% vs...","image":"https://media.daily.dev/image/upload/f_auto,q_auto/v1/posts/dd64b3994482762eebca16dee7b10b21?_a=AQAEuop","thumbnailUrl":"https://media.daily.dev/image/upload/f_auto,q_auto/v1/posts/dd64b3994482762eebca16dee7b10b21?_a=AQAEuop","isAccessibleForFree":true,"articleSection":"Together AI","inLanguage":"en","publisher":{"@type":"Organization","name":"daily.dev","url":"https://daily.dev","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","url":"https://daily.dev/apple-touch-icon.png","width":180,"height":180}},"author":{"@type":"Organization","name":"Together AI","logo":"https://media.daily.dev/image/upload/s--tCjWcJfJ--/f_auto,q_auto/v1780213200/logos/togetherai?_a=BAMAMiWQ0","url":"https://daily.dev/sources/togetherai"},"commentCount":0,"discussionUrl":"https://daily.dev/posts/kimi-k3-vs-gpt-5-6-sol-on-deepswe-cost-coding-and-routing-hnrwmvzdv","interactionStatistic":[{"@type":"InteractionCounter","interactionType":{"@type":"LikeAction"},"userInteractionCount":1},{"@type":"InteractionCounter","interactionType":{"@type":"CommentAction"},"userInteractionCount":0}],"keywords":"ai,ai-coding,ai-gateway,kimi","timeRequired":"PT6M"}
{"@context":"https://schema.org","@type":"BreadcrumbList","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https://daily.dev"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Together AI","item":"https://daily.dev/sources/togetherai"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":3,"name":"Kimi K3 vs GPT-5.6 Sol on DeepSWE: Cost, Coding, and Routing"}]}
{"@context":"https://schema.org","@type":"FAQPage","@id":"https://daily.dev/posts/kimi-k3-vs-gpt-5-6-sol-on-deepswe-cost-coding-and-routing-hnrwmvzdv#faq","mainEntity":[{"@type":"Question","name":"How does Kimi K3 compare to GPT-5.6 Sol on the DeepSWE coding benchmark?","acceptedAnswer":{"@type":"Answer","text":"GPT-5.6 Sol wins single-attempt quality with a pass@1 of 72.7% versus Kimi K3's 68.5%, and it solves more tasks reliably on all four tries (61 vs 45). Kimi K3 overtakes Sol as attempts increase, reaching 89.4% pass@4 versus Sol's 85.8%, while costing 64% less per completed task and delivering 2.8x more solves per dollar spent. daily.dev surfaces benchmark comparisons like this for teams weighing model cost against coding reliability."}},{"@type":"Question","name":"Does routing between Kimi K3 and GPT-5.6 Sol improve coding accuracy over using either model alone?","acceptedAnswer":{"@type":"Answer","text":"Yes, running Kimi K3 first and escalating to GPT-5.6 Sol whenever a test suite rejects the result reaches about 85.6% accuracy, beating both individual models and even a perfect one-shot router at 83.4%. The two models diverge with only 0.46 correlation on which tasks they solve, together covering 108 of 113 DeepSWE tasks, with Kimi clearing roughly 70% of the queue before Sol is invoked. engineers building verifier-based agent cascades can track routing strategies like this through daily.dev."}},{"@type":"Question","name":"What are the typical failure modes of Kimi K3 versus GPT-5.6 Sol on coding tasks?","acceptedAnswer":{"@type":"Answer","text":"GPT-5.6 Sol breaks the repository's existing baseline tests in 20% of its failures, a pattern consistent with other GPT models. Kimi K3 fails its baseline tests only 11% of the time but has near misses in 65% of failures, where over 80% of new tests pass but a few still fail, meaning it gets close without fully succeeding. daily.dev helps developers stay on top of model failure patterns before picking a coding agent backend."}}]}
```

