Governments and standards bodies worldwide are converging on memory safety as a critical security requirement. 70% of CVEs in large C/C++ codebases stem from memory safety issues. Key regulatory actions include the White House ONCD report (2024), NSA guidance naming Rust explicitly, CISA listing memory-unsafe languages as a 'bad practice' for critical infrastructure, DARPA's TRACTOR program funding automated C-to-Rust translation, the EU Cyber Resilience Act, and Germany's BSI naming Rust in NIS-2 guidance. Rust is positioned as the only production-ready memory-safe language for systems programming without a garbage collector. Organizations are advised to inventory memory-unsafe code, draft a memory safety roadmap (CISA recommends publishing one by end of 2025), and begin incremental migration using Rust's FFI. The post also promotes Corrode Rust Consulting services for organizations navigating this transition.

20m read timeFrom corrode.dev
Post cover image
Table of contents
Memory Safety Vulnerabilities Are EverywhereThe Regulatory Landscape: A Global Consensus Is FormingThe Regulatory Landscape at a GlanceWhy Rust, Specifically?The Cost of WaitingWhat a Memory Safety Roadmap Looks LikeYou Don’t Have to Do This AloneThe Cost of Inaction Far Exceeds the Cost of ActionNext StepsFrequently Asked Questions
1 Impression