A story about dogfooding an AI SRE tool (aiHelpDesk) against a Kubernetes noisy-neighbor memory pressure scenario, which uncovered three platform bugs rather than just improving playbook content. The bugs all shared a common root cause: letting LLM self-reports substitute for values the system already knows authoritatively. Key lessons include removing ambiguous agent-selection prompts, threading namespace values server-side instead of relying on model output, and isolating test harness flags from diagnosis prompts. The post argues that full audit trails and transparent, versioned YAML playbooks are what make AI SRE tooling trustworthy and debuggable, contrasting this with black-box vendor approaches.
Table of contents
Can you really trust an AI SRE tool that doesn’t know and doesn’t tell you when it’s wrong? We found 3 bugs by debugging our own AI. This is the story how. Could your AI SRE vendor/tool do it?Get Boris Dali ’s stories in your inbox14.6K Impressions2 Comments