AI-driven productivity gains have exposed a structural flaw in time-and-materials (T&M) software contracts: vendors have no incentive to pass efficiency savings to buyers. When AI tools cut developer effort by 30–50%, the vendor captures the margin improvement rather than reducing prices. Outcome-based, fixed-price contracts realign incentives by making delivery speed directly profitable for vendors, forcing rigorous scope definition, observable milestones, and governance systems. The author cites their own company's methodology (Ailoitte AI Velocity Pods) as delivering products in a median of 38 days vs. an industry average of 120 days. Buyers are advised to ask vendors directly whether AI-driven efficiency reductions would lower their price — the answer reveals the contract structure immediately.

4m read timeFrom medium.com
Post cover image
Table of contents
The Invisible Problem With Hourly BillingWhat the Numbers Actually SayWhat Outcome-Based Contracts Force You To DoGet Sunil Kumar’s stories in your inboxReal-World Example: Shipping in 38 Days vs. 120What to Ask Your Next Vendor
152 Impressions