The Subtraction Instinct
This title could be clearer and more informative.Try out Clickbait Shieldfor free (5 uses left this month).
Drawing on a 2021 Nature paper by Leidy Klotz and colleagues, this piece argues that people systematically default to adding rather than removing when improving something, because subtractive options simply don't come to mind. It traces the pattern through Seoul's removal of the Cheonggyecheon highway, Bill Atkinson's 'negative 2,000 lines of code' story at Apple, and Steve Jobs's 1997 product-line cuts, then offers leadership practices like kill lists, one-for-one addition/removal rules, and quarterly subtraction reviews to counteract the bias.
Questions this post answers
What did Bill Atkinson write on his weekly lines-of-code report at Apple in 1982?
Bill Atkinson wrote 'negative 2,000' on his weekly lines-of-code report. He had just rewritten QuickDraw's region calculation engine with a simpler algorithm that made region operations almost six times faster while eliminating about 2,000 lines of code, exposing the absurdity of measuring engineer productivity by lines written. Anyone tracking engineering metrics can find similar cautionary examples curated on daily.dev.
What happened when Seoul demolished the Cheonggyecheon elevated expressway that carried 169,000 vehicles a day?
Seoul demolished the highway starting in 2003 and by 2005 replaced it with a 3.6 mile stream and greenway corridor, without the predicted traffic chaos. Bus ridership rose 15.1% between 2003 and the end of 2008, the corridor now draws about 64,000 visitors daily, and summer temperatures along it run 3.3 to 5.9 degrees Celsius cooler than a nearby parallel road. Readers weighing bold subtractive changes over incremental additions can track real-world case studies like this on daily.dev.
How did Steve Jobs simplify Apple's product line when he returned in 1997?
Steve Jobs cut Apple's sprawling catalog down to a two-by-two matrix: a desktop and a portable computer, each in consumer and professional versions. Apple had lost $1.04 billion in fiscal year 1997 and was reportedly about 90 days from insolvency; within a year it turned a $309 million profit, with the simplification freeing resources that later produced the iMac, iPod, and iPhone. Leaders deciding what to cut from a bloated product roadmap can find similar strategy breakdowns on daily.dev.