A practical framework for deciding when to implement AI agent functionality as a tool versus a subagent. Tools execute deterministic code (API calls, database queries, calculations) and share the orchestrator's context window, while subagents run their own LLM reasoning loops in isolated contexts. The article presents a three-question decision framework: Is the task execution or reasoning? Does intermediate work matter to the orchestrator? Can the task run independently? It warns against over-engineering by defaulting to subagents prematurely, noting they add latency, cost, and debugging complexity. The recommended approach is to start with a single agent and well-designed tools, only introducing subagents when they provide clear architectural advantages like parallel execution, context isolation, or specialized tool sets.

11m read timeFrom machinelearningmastery.com
Post cover image
Table of contents
IntroductionWhat Tools AreWhat Subagents AreTools vs Subagents: The Key DifferencesWhen to Use a ToolWhen to Use a SubagentThe Decision FrameworkThe Overengineering TrapWhat Adding Subagents Actually CostsSummary
180 Impressions