A side-by-side comparison of the traditional reliability engineering view versus the resilience engineering view across 16 dimensions. Key contrasts include: traditional focuses on root cause while resilience engineering examines interaction of multiple factors; traditional treats human variability as a liability while resilience engineering treats it as an asset; traditional aims to reduce complexity while resilience engineering focuses on navigating it; and traditional emphasizes automation benefits while resilience engineering highlights automation risks.
Table of contents
Share this:22 Impressions