AI SAST refers to static application security testing where an AI reasons about code rather than matching patterns. Two distinct approaches exist: AI-native SAST (reasoning-based, finds IDORs, business logic flaws, broken access control) and AI-augmented SAST (traditional rule-based scanner with AI triage/autofix bolted on). AI-native SAST fills the gap between deterministic SAST and pentesting — it reads source code like a senior engineer, traces cross-file references, and catches logic flaws that have no syntactic signature. It's more expensive per scan than traditional SAST but cheaper than AI pentesting, making it best suited for high-stakes changes and release audits rather than every commit. The recommended layered approach: deterministic SAST on every commit, AI SAST on critical code paths, and AI pentesting against deployed environments for runtime validation.

9m read timeFrom aikido.dev
Post cover image
Table of contents
What does AI SAST mean?How AI-native SAST is different from regular SASTWhat AI SAST catchesHow does AI SAST compare to AI pentesting?Do you need SAST, AI SAST, and AI pentesting?What AI SAST means for AppSec teams
370 Impressions