A developer shares their experience running Claude Code and Cursor simultaneously rather than choosing one over the other. Claude Code excels at execution-heavy tasks — running terminals, installing packages, debugging, and making project-wide changes across large codebases — while Cursor is better for code review, navigation, and iterative refinement. The parallel workflow lets developers divide work by each tool's strengths: Claude Code handles broad implementation and architectural tasks autonomously, while Cursor provides fast indexing, file navigation, and a better environment for inspecting changes in real time.

4m read timeFrom xda-developers.com
Post cover image
Table of contents
Claude Code handles execution better than CursorCursor remains the better place to review and refine codeRunning both tools creates a parallel workflow
204 Impressions